Experimenting with choir formations
could give your choir a boost
Welcome and unexpected benefits come from changing things around in your rehearsal room. Here's how to get started.
Why change your choir's formation?
Does your choir stand or sit in the same formation every rehearsal? Your singers may think it's great to be in the same spot every week, but it's likely making them a bit lazy and reliant on hearing the same voices in their ears.
The benefits of experimenting with new formations
When you perform in a new space, your singers need to be responsive and flexible to adapt to the circumstances. You can build their confidence in rehearsals by mixing up voice parts or just moving singers around within their parts.
Be strong!
Lots of singers feel resistant to change. Ignore any grumbles and stick to your guns. Mixing things up will pay dividends in the long run.
How to get started
A great way to get started with new formations is to change things around during your warm-ups or cool-downs. Mix up voice parts, stand in a big circle, face the other side of the room. You can have everyone walk around the room to get a dynamic listening experience. There's no right or wrong - just give your singers a new perspective.
An easy, fun warm-up to download FREE
Rounds are a great tool for experimenting with choir formations. They're easy to teach because everyone learns the same part. LUCKY ME is super-quick to learn and has an inspiring message - lucky me, I get to sing!
Hit the button below to download a free demo track and score.
A deeper dive into
choir formations
Interested in experimenting with choir formations? Here are some things to think about.
Choirs come in all shapes and sizes. They could include a handful of voices or a hundred, comprise men, women, children. Pretty much any choir you can imagine exists and they all have one thing in common. They make music and they want that music to be heard. And that leads us to the subject of choir formation - in what order should the singers in a choir stand to make the best sound?
Any decision on choir formation, whether for rehearsal or performance, is going to be based on several criteria: the size and position of the platform or room, the size of the audience, the acoustics in the venue, the number of singers, the position of the conductor. The formation of the choir in performance is going to affect not only what the audience hears, but what the singers and conductor see and here - in other words, the experience of everyone involved. No pressure then!
There's no right or wrong way to arrange your choir. There are so many different variables involved that it's impossible to create reliable guidelines. However, there is some research on the subject, which we'll have a look at later.
What choir formations are available to us and how should we select the best formation for a particular space? Let's break the decision down into two sections: position and spacing.
Position
In a traditional mixed 'SATB' choir (soprano, alto, tenor, bass) the singers usually stand in sections according to voice part. The most common arrangement of voice parts is, in my experience, STBA (as viewed by the conductor).
One advantage of an STBA arrangement is that the higher (soprano & tenor) and lower (alto and bass) voices are next to each other. The men are in the centre which can be helpful for choirs with a greater number of women than men. It's also useful to have the tenors and basses together if the choir is singing any SAB arrangements.
Another common arrangement is SATB. Personally, I like this formation less than STBA. In most choirs I see, there are many more SAs than TBs and having the men over on one side looks unbalanced, even if it doesn't sound unbalanced.
Less favoured, but still quite common is SA at the front, TB at the back. I've seen this formation when choirs are singing in spaces that are deeper than they are wide. It makes sense in terms of the sight lines of the choir as the men tend to be taller than the women, on average, but it's pretty terrible sound-wise as the lower parts have to travel over the top of the upper. I also know from experience (being tall, I always get sent to the back!) that being at the back of several rows of bodies can be pretty unsatisfying for the singers.
All of these formations are variations on a theme - each voice part huddles together and creates a block of sound. The blocks are arranged in whatever way the conductor sees fit. The advantage of these formations for the conductor is that they can direct specific sections of the choir easily. If they turn to the sopranos to give a lead, it's clear to the rest of the choir that the lead is not for them. The singers have the comfort of having others around them singing the same thing. The downside is that singers become reliant on each other and mistakes can have a 'ripple effect'.
A completely different approach is to mix the voices up so that each singer is surrounded by singers of other voice parts. A variation on this idea is having singers in pairs, so they're mixed up, but have a 'buddy' of the same voice part.
I've experimented with these formations and have had fantastic feedback from the choir. They report that they feel more involved in the music as a whole and get a much deeper understanding of a piece. They also tell me that being mixed up forces them to take more responsibility for their own performance and to rely less on the their neighbour. A mixed formation certainly affects the sound the choir makes. This is purely anecdotal, but my perception from the front of the choir is that the sound is fuller and richer, and that the choir is more responsive.
A mixed formation is more challenging for the conductor because you're directing a mass of singers and giving leads and gestures to the whole group all the time. This takes some planning. If one part has a crescendo and everyone else is quiet, how are you going to give that direction?
Spacing
Some interesting research has been done on the spacing between singers in a choir. A study found that both singers and listeners significantly preferred a formation where the choir was spread out (so their upper arms were about 18 inches apart) to a formation where they were close together. The authors of the study speculate that this may be the result of the different ways in which sound moves around when the singers are spaced out. Interestingly, the research also identified that listeners to the choir significantly preferred female singers to be more widely spaced than male singers.
The overall message is, I think, that choir formation is something that's well worth experimenting with. Apart from anything else, switching things around every now and then will keep your singers on their toes and prevent them from getting too reliant on being in a particular position in the choir.